I will show you  a compare and contrast essay  for”Caching Fire” by Suzanne Collins and “Better Nate Than Ever” by Tim Federle (he visited our class room). Both books are very good.

 

Both books have some cool differences. In”Caching Fire” the main character is a girl where in “Better Nate Than Ever” the main character is a boy. “Caching Fire” is more of an action book whereas  “Better Nate Than Ever”is a peaceful book. In “Caching Fire” Katniss has a sister, in contrast “Better Nate Than ever” the main character Nate has a brother. In one story, Nate is going some where for fun yet  Katniss is going some where against her will.

 

Just because there are differences doesn’t  mean there aren’t any similarities. Both stories have an unpleasant back story. Both stories have a main character that have one sibling and two parents. In these stories each character  had a rough life.

 

In conclusion, Catching Fire is a better book because it is suspenseful and unpredictable. I do not like “Better Nate Than Ever” because it is too tame and predictable. There were very few moments that piqued my interest and imagination. “Catching Fire” wins by a landslide. “Better Nate Than Ever” is close but “Catching Fire” is better.

!!!!!!!(:BOTH BOOKS ARE GREAT:)!!!!!!!